Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: federal__reserve

Good point!

I find it amazing, though, that some think that because they don’t know (or don’t remember - yikes!) a pol’s history with the electorate, that history doesn’t exist or doesn’t matter.

I’m not saying Newt’s political history is insurmountable — this IS politics, after all. But dismissing or ignoring it’s potential impact seems unwise.


140 posted on 11/19/2011 5:32:30 AM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG
All eyes are on Newt at the time being. Especially tonight, when there is a good chance that most everyone tuning into the debate are doing so to watch Newt handle the MSM again.

Romney will not be there in Iowa, which is also quite subliminal that he does not hold much regard for flyover country. Newt has been a complete opposite in Iowa and has established a headquarters there since the beginning of the year. He has gone door to door and face to face there for months.

I predict that Newt will solidify his lead into the solid 30% range from here on out. If there is an increase in viewers for this debate, the indication will be that they are watching to see Newt perform. And we all know how likely that will turn out. He has become MR. Newt, rock solid, razor sharp, Media dragon killer, Gingrich.

143 posted on 11/19/2011 5:52:35 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson