Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: The phony intellectual
washingtonpost.com ^ | 11/17/2011 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 11/18/2011 1:32:48 AM PST by federal__reserve

And there is Gingrich the liberal. “The liberal revulsion toward him obscured how unorthodox — occasionally, how liberal — his conservatism was. The books then and now are full of heresy. He showed a willingness to criticize other Republicans, even Reagan at the height of his popularity. He advocated a health tax on alcohol to discourage drinking — social engineering, it’s called — and imagined government-issued credit cards that would allow citizens to order goods and services directly from the feds. He thought the government should run nutritional programs at grocery stores and give away some foodstuffs free. He was pushing cuts in the defense budget in 1984 and a prototype of President Obama’s cash-for-clunkers program in 1995.”What is noteworthy is not only how liberal are his prescriptions, but how mundanely statist they are.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: circularfiringsquad; corruption4newt; cronycapital4newt; gingrich; newt; newtbotsquad; whinersfornewt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: federal__reserve
From the RINO RNC perspective, Newt's job is to be the anti-Cain such that Hermann can't develop sufficient steam to have a majority of delegates over Romney before the convention, where they believe they can "fix" it.

See tag line.

81 posted on 11/19/2011 10:00:37 AM PST by Carry_Okie (In the GOP, desperation is the mother of convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve
Newt has always been a knowledgeable and energized speaker. He's also an arrogant and ugly pinhead with questionable core values.

Conservatives can do better.

82 posted on 11/19/2011 10:04:17 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve

Newt knows that government is too big and intrusive, and he has ideas for hundreds of government programs to fix that.


83 posted on 11/19/2011 10:16:10 AM PST by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee

“We are in real trouble.’

Your’s a glass half-empty sort. As Rush said yesterday, and I totally agree, ALL of the candidates have something of value to offer, and any of them would turn around our country from its current course of destruction.


84 posted on 11/19/2011 10:18:27 AM PST by Rennes Templar (Cain Train is rollin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"Conservatives can do better."

I'm supporting Newt and I happen to agree with you on that.

Unfortunately, DeMint, Jindal, Barbour, Daniels, Ryan, Palin, and Rubio are not running.

85 posted on 11/19/2011 10:21:21 AM PST by Notary Sojac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve
Why can't you put a disclaimer in the title so that you distance yourself as a Conservative from the ENEMY MEDIA?

Gingrich: The phony intellectual [WashPo thinks only Libs can be intellectuals of course]
86 posted on 11/19/2011 10:24:36 AM PST by jobim (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

If we conservatives want to beat Obama, we’ll have to do better than Newt.

Redux 2008, anyone? LOL


87 posted on 11/19/2011 10:25:13 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve; Admin Moderator

WTF. This is not breaking news.


88 posted on 11/19/2011 10:27:52 AM PST by Lazamataz (Monkeys do not like getting slapped, contrary to popular belief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve; don-o; TitansAFC
If you and others are gonna attack Newt now with Breaking News attacks like you did against Bachmann, Perry and anyone else who has traction instead of your chosen candidate...Palin..all for naught or now Cain...again likely for naught

then by all means ask your buds to put Newt in as a keyword

all we still have is Palin this and that as keywords and she didn't even run

Cain never got a keyword either

Imagine Breaking News bashing Palin...Fresno woulda zotted yer butt to the moon in a nanosecond

if We are to become a Cain only board I'd like to know cause right now it's odds Newt or Mitt and Cain trailing and the rest done for...and primaries are close...is FR gonna join the media to attack Newt and get Mitt nominated unintentionally?

if I ran a thread claiming Cain is a fake...do you really think the mods would leave it up

all this zotting and fighting is not going amongst a few hundred folks is not going to do anything but create hard feelings

we may have a DFU or buckhead moment but that is about the extent of our influence

but once...we did have some influence

89 posted on 11/19/2011 10:30:28 AM PST by wardaddy (Ethnonationalist...I'll cop to that....Suicide of a Superpower...I've decided for Newt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Yeah, something doesn’t quite smell right about Gingrich.

"Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien(The perfect is the enemy of the good.)"

We're gonna lose.

90 posted on 11/19/2011 10:37:16 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve; Admin Moderator

Hear Hear.

My faith restored...thanks AM!


91 posted on 11/19/2011 10:37:26 AM PST by wardaddy (Ethnonationalist...I'll cop to that....Suicide of a Superpower...I've decided for Newt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

I hope and pray you are right. However Newt has made many turns in his career, so one never knows which Newt will show up.


92 posted on 11/19/2011 10:37:32 AM PST by federal__reserve (What matters in 2012 is jobs, jobs, jobs! Jobs kill unemployment, foreclosures & deficits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I see plenty of Cain bashing on FR.

All of the candidates have flaws, that is a given.

The question we all have to ask, how would those flaws translate into actions of the candidate if they were to become President?

In Newt's case, I see someone who is deeply entrenched in the Beltway mindset, more so than any other GOP candidate.

And someone who apparently doesn't even consider the 10th Amendment when proposing some new federal program.

I think Newt could beat Obama's fanny in debates, more so than any other candidate in the race - that is a given.

But how well will he run while carrying all of his years of baggage? His history to me shows a man who cannot control his appetites or his instincts. One thing I always felt about Reagan was that he was a very disciplined man. I get no such sense from Newt.

To me, outside of the RINO twins of Romney and Huntsman and the moonbat candidacy of RuPaul, Newt is the hardest sell - just because has, over the last 15 years, popped up continually shilling for DC to have more influence, at a time when we need someone who truly believes DC needs less.

93 posted on 11/19/2011 10:41:44 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I have zero hard feelings against those who bashed Cain and Palin and Bachmann, my preferred candidates. I am old and mature and I know we are in the primary season, and vetting is a natural part of the process.

In 2008, McCain was last on my list, yet I voted for him.
In 2012, I am going t vote for the nominee, even if he is on the bottom of my list.


94 posted on 11/19/2011 10:42:36 AM PST by federal__reserve (What matters in 2012 is jobs, jobs, jobs! Jobs kill unemployment, foreclosures & deficits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve

My point is to poke a little fun at Newt. He’s by nature a tinkerer and a meddler, not the sort of person who understands the concept of limited government.

I think he’d be a lousy president — but that’s a completely abstract thought as he’d be an even worse nominee.


95 posted on 11/19/2011 10:42:57 AM PST by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

This thread was moved there, and not by me.


96 posted on 11/19/2011 10:43:17 AM PST by federal__reserve (What matters in 2012 is jobs, jobs, jobs! Jobs kill unemployment, foreclosures & deficits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jobim

Point well taken.


97 posted on 11/19/2011 10:44:06 AM PST by federal__reserve (What matters in 2012 is jobs, jobs, jobs! Jobs kill unemployment, foreclosures & deficits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich
yeah, that’s the plan..the white knight will destroy Romney, right?

mitt seems to have reached a ceiling of 20-30%, and the other 70-80% shifts from one candidate to another, shopping a bit, saying "hmmmm..." and then saying "no, I think I'll go with the other one". What this all could lead to is a contentious convention where no candidate is chosen on the first ballot. Many delegates are released from their vote after some number of ballots (I presume it varies, 3? 5? x?), whence they can vote for anybody, including beyond the current bunch now on primary ballots. Should be an interesting time if there is no one guy standing... but, of course, not a single vote has been cast YET, and no delegates are yet chosen.

98 posted on 11/19/2011 10:44:23 AM PST by C210N (zer0 - a Marxonist spreading the flames of obamunism wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Ding..Ding..Ding..Ding

You nailed it!

99 posted on 11/19/2011 10:46:01 AM PST by federal__reserve (What matters in 2012 is jobs, jobs, jobs! Jobs kill unemployment, foreclosures & deficits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve
Kind of a given, isn't it?

Newt is much more of a talker -- a big talker -- than a deep thinker.

Surely nobody needed Jennifer Rubin and the Washington Post (or Andrew Ferguson and the Weekly Standard) to tell us that.

Sorry, Newtonians and Harry Turtledove, but the writers of counterfactual history novels are not serious intellectuals almost by definition (If that excludes MacKinlay Kantor and Winston Churchill from serious intellectualism so much the worse for them).

What I would have liked to see was an analysis in 2007 or 2008 of just how seriously intellectual Barack Obama was.

100 posted on 11/19/2011 10:46:04 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson