Skip to comments.
Ron Paul is for real in Iowa. Seriously.
The Washington Post ^
| November 17, 2011
| Chris Cillizza
Posted on 11/17/2011 2:26:31 PM PST by Kurt Evans
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-203 next last
To: John D
freedom isn’t free? Do you want to go to war w Iran if Obama tells you so?
161
posted on
11/19/2011 5:02:53 AM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: GlockThe Vote
I have served in the past, like my father and my son. We all realize, like another poster just stated FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. I know there are cowards around who want all the benefits our great country has to offer, but are afraid to stand up and fight to keep them, like Cut and Run.
162
posted on
11/19/2011 5:06:43 AM PST
by
John D
To: John D
cowards? So I have to prove my man hood if Obama orders me to war in lybia, Ira, Syria, Uganda etc?
Sorry, no dice. let congress declare war and we will talk.
163
posted on
11/19/2011 5:08:57 AM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: Kurt Evans
Ron Paul is the closest politician philosophically to the Founding Fathers
http://dailybail.com/home/thomas-jefferson-lives-hes-ron-paul.html
His ridicule is a measure of how far the United States have deviated from their original objectives of facilitating business with one another and the world.
The proof of this lies in the national debt...and a Federal Government no longer under control of the States.
FWIW I have never been a “Paulbot” ...nor do I believe he intends to ever get near the Oval Office....but he does try to influence the discussion to where he believes it should go. Whenever he gets traction...he does the “crazy uncle” thing just enough....
164
posted on
11/19/2011 5:11:51 AM PST
by
mo
To: GlockThe Vote
So I have to prove my man hood if Obama orders me to war in lybia,
Not if you are not willing to serve. There is no draft. My family and I are willing to do what we can to keep America safe and free. The surrender monkey and his herd of followers think appeasement is the answer. Bullies thrive on cowards, and terrorists are bullies, and Cut and Run is a coward.
165
posted on
11/19/2011 5:15:24 AM PST
by
John D
To: okie01
There were many other factors in the run-up to WWII, the scrap issue was simply their excuse.
Similarly, there are many factors in play in the ME as well.
For anyone to pick one reason for the attacks is silly, and Ron Paul has not expressed such a definitive position.
Our military presence and bombing the crap out of them is probably not the real reason they attacked.
166
posted on
11/19/2011 5:38:19 AM PST
by
Designer
(Nit-pickin' and chagrinin')
To: John D
sorry, I am not willing to sacrifice other people’s family members for Obama wars. When congress declares a war, call me up and I will do my part.
Until then, I don’t buy into the wag the dog bs by Obama and our latest boogie man of the day bs.
167
posted on
11/19/2011 6:18:11 AM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: John D
168
posted on
11/19/2011 6:20:24 AM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: Designer
Our military presence and bombing the crap out of them is probably not the real reason they attacked. Our "military presence" was a function of...what?
Fighting to re-gain Kuwait for its people...and defending Saudi Arabia (and Mecca) from a pending Iraqi invasion. Was it not?
Our "bombing the crap out of them" traced to...what?
Our UN assigned role to protect the Kurds and the Shi'ites from attack and slaughter by Saddam Hussein.
If the Islamists were offended by these worthy roles, that's their problem. And Ron Paul's. Not ours.
There were many other factors in the run-up to WWII, the scrap issue was simply their excuse.
Agreed. An excuse...not a reason. Just like the two excuses you (and Paul) cite above.
169
posted on
11/19/2011 1:22:50 PM PST
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
To: thackney
>Is that why you posted the picture of Paul with Reagan? Because you agree with Paul's rejection of the works of Reagan?
Of course not. I posted it because I agree with Ron's support for Reagan's conservative ideals.
170
posted on
11/21/2011 8:33:47 PM PST
by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: Kurt Evans
I am voting for Ron Paul. The more I read, the more I research, the more I look in to issues RP is the only choice for me in the primary.
171
posted on
11/21/2011 8:37:27 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: Darksheare
>Oh, you mean teh same RonPaul who associates with Alex Jones, and the founder of Stormfront, ,the same RonPaul who says that Reagan was a failure? The same RonPaul whose minions still try to steal some of Reagans legitimacy by posting pictures of RonPaul with the person he said was a failure? The Same RonPaul who apparently supports OCCUPY WALLSTREET and the leftists running it?
Um, no. You seem to be talking about a different Ron Paul.
172
posted on
11/21/2011 8:45:35 PM PST
by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: lormand
>At that time, Presidents were not dictators but shared power with the Legistlative branch. Guess who owned the House and Senate in Reagan's second term genius?
"It was tragic to listen to Ronald Reagan on the 1986 campaign trail bragging about his high spending on farm subsidies, welfare, warfare, etc., in his futile effort to hold on to control of the Senate."
--Ron Paul, 1987
Reagan seriously compromised his conservative ideals while Republicans still constituted a Senate majority.
173
posted on
11/21/2011 9:05:23 PM PST
by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: GlockThe Vote
>I am voting for Ron Paul. The more I read, the more I research, the more I look in to issues RP is the only choice for me in the primary.
I'm leaning Ron's way too, but keep an open mind. :)
174
posted on
11/21/2011 9:13:09 PM PST
by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: Kurt Evans
The same Ron Paul who voted to allow homosexuals to serve openly in the military and said that heterosexuals cause more problems than homosexuals?
YThe same Ron Paul who said we must be friends with Iran?
That Ron Paul?
175
posted on
11/22/2011 5:42:27 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
To: Eaker
It is too bad that you don’t seem able to discuss things in a mature manner. My rules are that I let people know that if they wish to engage in civil discusion, then fine. However, if they don’t and wish to be nasty, then they will get as good as they give.
I am far from being a “surrender monkey”. I don’t listen to the MSM, nor is Romney my choice. But I know that Paul will not garner the nomination. Paul has some good ideas, but throws them down the drain when he heads for the cliff on the Left. His foreign policy, if you can call it that, would be disasterous. He thinks we should employ mercenaries, and privateers. There are other things that just won’t fly.
As for your assertion of the “fag agenda”, I would like to know what you think that is. BTW, good arguments are lost when resorting to using name calling, and derogeratory references. I disagree with the teaching of Gay studies in schools, especially pre-school and kindergarden. I don’t like when Gays push their agenda on businesses, etc. Is this what you are referring to?
I’m not up on all the abbreviations. I want to see if your closing comment “FUMR” means fk u mitt romney. If it was meant to offend. You lose.
176
posted on
11/22/2011 4:34:19 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: Eaker
Not a libtard rhino. Not shallow. And definitely posses manners and a better grasp of the English language. Since you obviously can not read, I DO NOT SUPPORT ROMNEY!! As for shoving anything up my ass, here's too you, trollboy! UP YOURS!!
177
posted on
11/22/2011 4:44:08 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: oneamericanvoice
I DO NOT SUPPORT ROMNEY!!WELL THEN QUIT SUPPORTING ROMNEY!
Your manners and grasp of the English language is not impressive either.
178
posted on
11/22/2011 5:24:33 PM PST
by
Eaker
(Nothing even remotely praising Romney should be posted because one should stick to the truth.)
To: Eaker
Sod off Swampie. I’m way out of your league. You are pretty dense, so I’ll go slow. I...never...supported...Romney.
Now go back to the hole.
End of transmission.
179
posted on
11/22/2011 7:10:16 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: oneamericanvoice
Romney sucks so bad even his supporters won’t admit they support him!
LOL!
180
posted on
11/22/2011 8:00:39 PM PST
by
Eaker
(Nothing even remotely praising Romney should be posted because one should stick to the truth.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson