Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Scott

The problem with Herman is that he has less breadth and depth concerning world affairs than the average poster here at FR. And I might add that I like Herman and think you are absolutely correct about the debt run up by the best and brightest.


28 posted on 11/17/2011 2:00:39 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

Clinton didn’t even come CLOSE to making a foreign policy decision for the first two years he was in office, according to Morris. I sure as hell think Heman’s ability to staff well is superior to anyone in the bunch. But I think they would bring different strengths. I was excited that Mr. Newt decided to run. I’d have no trouble voting for him—or any of them for that matter, except the one who must be referred to as mittens.


79 posted on 11/17/2011 2:36:52 PM PST by ichabod1 (Nuts; A house divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07
For all the fuss about Cain's pause on Libya, Gingrich's actual answers on Libya do not inspire confidence:

Newt Attempts to Clarify his Answers on Libya.

83 posted on 11/17/2011 2:40:58 PM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07
The problem with Herman is that he has less breadth and depth concerning world affairs than the average poster here at FR. And I might add that I like Herman and think you are absolutely correct about the debt run up by the best and brightest.

I agree that Herman Cain does not have the solid grasp of foreign policy that many of us would like to see. However, very few successful presidential candidates (usually state governors) come to the Oval Office with such knowledge. What I believe Cain has is a quick mind and a bold (not belligerent) attitude about Americas place in the world. That is, a defined idea of what is right and what is needed to deal with rogue states (Iran, North Korea). A philosophy, if you will. That is paramount, to me. He can be schooled by aides on 'foreign policy' details and learn the names of the leaders of obscure countries if he has to and I'm sure he will be doing so as the campaign continues because he must realize this is a weak point for him and could hurt his chances in the primaries. However, I don't see Newt Gingrich as being the epitome of foreign policy expertise, either. He is just more articulate when speaking on it which is fine but doesn't convince me that he is the kind of 'conservative' I want as president.

Frankly, the economy is what will determine who wins the Republican primary race and all this sudden concern about foreign policy expertise is mostly the MSM throwing curve balls at Republican candidates and rival candidates seeking to exploit what they see as other candidates weak spots. I hope conservatives don't allow ourselves to get mired into making this the major factor in deciding who our candidate will be. I certainly don't intend to do so.

90 posted on 11/17/2011 2:53:04 PM PST by Jim Scott (on the 'Cain Train')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson