I, too, am against making wild accusations. An accusation can destroy a person’s life. The initial headlines are on the front page. The aquittal is buried on page ten.
However, this isn’t a wild accusation. This is grand jury testimony that was done under oath. I think that carries a little more weight.
I was referring to the idea that Sandusky was running an underage homosexual prostitution ring with the blessing of his charity, the University, the football program, and half the town. That is a wild accusation. I personally believe that Sandusky is guilty of being a serial abuser based on the report. There is a convincing case for that. Even so, he gets his day in court.
The other accusations are, at this moment, completely unfounded. If some evidence can be found for that, then those involved deserve everything coming to them.