Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jukeman
The only thing that makes Newt's consulting appear worse is that it was a lot more money. In reality, though, Newt was a private citizen at the time, and there is no evidence that he was a "lobbyist" despite the accusation.
23 posted on 11/17/2011 7:56:32 AM PST by RockinRight (The circular firing squad among conservatives has Romney smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight

Newt’s payments need to put in context:

(1) At the time, Newt had been out of government for a while.

(2) Nobody in their right mind thought Newt would ever hold an elective office again.

(3) Newt’s political influence within the GOP has always been a glass-half-empty vs glass-half-full proposition. For every current GOP insider that likes Newt, there’s another GOP insider that can’t stand the guy.

If you were going to pay some guy to buy influence inside the GOP, Newt would be way down the list.

If I were a Freddie Mac shareholder, I wouldn’t be asking “why did you give THAT MUCH MONEY to Newt?”, I’d be asking “Why did you give that much money to NEWT?”


27 posted on 11/17/2011 8:10:52 AM PST by Brookhaven (The media is throwing smoke bombs at Cain and claiming the smoke is proof of fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
There is no evidence he was not a lobbyist either.
30 posted on 11/17/2011 8:13:19 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson