PING!!!
Watch your back...
The first four words of the headline have to be wrong: “New Hampshire Wakes Up,” for they sleep perpetually there regarding their liberalism. Yes, I know that they are less liberal than their neighbors but still totally unreliable.
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2011/111116/frontpage-storm.html
...”Meanwhile, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (r) has filed an election law complaint in New Hampshire, seeking to remove President Barack Hussein Obama from the ballot as a democrat Party presidential candidate due to his lack of eligibility; lack of any legal and verifiable identification documents; the fraudulent use of a Connecticut-issued Social Security number, which was never assigned to him, according to both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification System; and due to the use of computer generated forgery instead of a valid long-form U.S. birth certificate.
Section 5 of the Federal Voting Rights Act states, Anyone may report alleged violations of state or federal election laws subject to enforcement by the Attorney General by submitting a completed complaint form.
According to Taitz, one does not need to be a resident of New Hampshire, an early primary state, to file a complaint.
The law goes on to state, The Attorney General will evaluate each complaint.
However, under the same section it states, The Attorney General’s Office will publicly neither confirm nor deny the receipt of a complaint nor the existence of an investigation, unless doing so is deemed necessary to gather information or alert the public to a preventable hazard.
Taitz said she received calls on Tuesday from two Republican state representatives from New Hampshire, Harry Accornero and Larry Rappoport, to say they are joining her in her elections challenge of Obama in New Hampshire. According to Taitz, they have forwarded her complaint to other legislators, asking them to join.
Sonoran News learned late Wednesday afternoon that the Ballot Law Commission will review Taitzs complaint seeking removal of Obama from the New Hampshire primary ballot at 2 p.m. this Friday, Nov. 18.
Taitz is also running for the U.S. Senate in 2012, challenging the seat currently held by Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer....”
Quite interesting development. It may be the start of a wonderful downfall for the Kenyan usurper.
BTTT (for later read).
We need people at this hearing to ensure that Orly doesn’t screw this up. Forget about the social security number. Stay on target. This country’s highest legal authority, the Supreme Court, exclusively defined natural-born citizen as “born in the country to parents who were its citizens” (defined in BOTH Minor v. Happersett and U.S. v Wong Kim Ark). The court also specifed in Wong Kim Ark that children born in the country of citizen parents were EXCLUDED from the citizen clause of the 14th amendment, meaning that Obama is not and cannot be a natural-born citizen, even under a claim of 14th amendment citizenship. NBCs were distinguished from foreigners and aliens who had to rely on OTHER means of becoming citizens at birth, but of means for which there was doubt. Further, under the common-law precedent cited in Wong Kim Ark, Obama would exclusively be born a British subject. The Supreme Court’s definition of NBC excludes any possibility of dual citizenship, and the Constitution does NOT allow natural-born British subjects to be eligible for the office of president.
The people of New Hampshire are too busy dealing with a bloody crime wave to be worrying about this right now, I’m afraid.
bump
I am going to make my best effort to attend this hearing and if I am allowed I will try and do some recording. In any event, if I am there, I will report live if I can or hit the nearest Starbucks after and report here on this thread what I learn.
The easiest lies to get away with are the ones so outrageous that people think it would be outrageous to try to lie and get away with it.
This is why Barack Barry Hussein Soetoro Dunham (et.al) has been able to get away with the second greatest fraud of all time.
I watched the whole video. The simple trick of the chairman calling the Assistant SOS as a witness and not the actual SOS was enough to prevent any questions being asked of the SOS under Oath that could in theory be legally actionable in a appeal.
In the heat of the Moment I don't think Orly spotted the trickery until after her time for questions was up.
The point is that the Assistant SOS is not the person legally responsible, so her evasions are not actionable.
Even if Orly had challenged and requested the Actual SOS as a witness, I think the chairman would have refused it.
The SOS was a Democrat, so this was always going to be a fix of some kind.
Virginia and Florida both have SOS type positions that are freshly appointed by the new state Governor when he/she is elected.
Both these governors are conservatives and may have appointed SOS’s that are serious about the US constitution.
Perhaps Orly should research these two states.