It is amazing how one person is found by the media to have the opposite view of most that have been interviewed and people on this forum jump in line.
The person interviewed is making assumptions, he has no facts. The ‘pimping’ reporter has gone silent, is that because they had no facts?
Let’s allow the legal process to proceed before we convict.
Do you really think if Paterno was covering up they would have continued to allow Sandusky access to the campus? They would have told him to stay away and would have had the leverage to do so. Let’s start using common sense and stop the wild accusations.
Common sense?
I’m common, I used my own sense and drew my own conclusions.
Consider that penn st hs been the most lgbt friendly campus in the country for a decade or more.
Consider that the campus admin are mostly gay.
Consider all the reports saying joepa had some dictaorial control over the intire institution.
Consider that most gay men become gay after sexual buse in their childhood or teens years.
Dude, i’m sorry if you like penn st footbal, but it was paid for by the prostitution of young boys. In my common opinion.
The “reporter” who made the “pimping out the boys to PSU donors” charge, was one who started connecting the dots (back in April). He is Pittsburgh sports talker Mark Maden. And no...he has NOT backed away from the “pimping” out aspect of story.
It is amazing how one person is found by the media to
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
What is really surprising (well??) is they found this guy BEFORE finding a single girl friend, or for that matter schoolboy friend of the Occupant of the White House......or college transcripts etc etc etc
Absolutely. I mean, the courts found OJ innocent, didn't they?