Cain has demonstrated he does not have the knowledge of world affairs to make a decision without discussing it with his staff.
Only a blithering tyrannical idiot in that position makes a decision without without discussing it with his/her staff.
I'd rather have a guy who knows the difference between right and wrong with no experience than an amoral guy with 50 years of "experience". Clinton had no qualms about bombing innocent people in Kosovo. Obama had no qualms bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia. Bush II had no qualms sending two innocent Border Patrol agents to jail. And no president in recent history has a problem with the invasion of our southern border.
The only question we need to ask is that a person seeking the highest office in the land knows the difference between right and wrong and is willing to do the right thing.
If that time comes, I want someone in that office that has convinced me they could make a snap decision without their staffs input.
Cain hasn't demonstrated that to me.