I defend nothing Sandusky did or says. That is up to him to defend himself. I just as I just posted don’t believe in witch hunts and think he has the right to defend himself.
How does assessing the overwhelming evidence against the man and determining that he’s guilty as sin deny him of due process? None of us could get on a jury if we wanted to.
Has every opinion you’ve ever formed about a person involved in a criminal matter always come after the jury has reached a verdict? You’ve never looked at evidence and arrived at a conclusion on your own?