Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

This becoming public knowledge, whatever this is, is NOT the case. That Sandusky was investigated previously and the DA did not charge him was apparently public knowledge.

There will be two cases if this goes to trial. The state will present its case. The defense will present its case for defense. Then the trier[s] of fact will decide. So far you have only heard a small part of the governments version and they presume him guilty or they would not charge him.


224 posted on 11/14/2011 11:49:41 PM PST by JLS (How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

Whether it was a matter of public record or not is not the issue. It was certainly not a national news story or common knowledge, therefore your statement made no sense in context.


234 posted on 11/15/2011 12:07:52 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson