[Williams]

Yep. For example, we were told many times that sandusky “admitted” what he did in the shower, but wasn’t prosecuted. That seems highly unlikely that he admitted to a sex act with a child. Far more likely he said he was “horsing around”. And remember being seen in the shower was the strongest evidence we’ve heard.

Not saying he’s innocent for one second. I have no idea and guess that he’s guilty.

[MHGinTN]

When/if you read the Grand Jury presentments, more than one victim has claimed behavior by Sandusky common to the incidents when the child tried to shower further away from Snadusky. These victims also testified that Sandusky committed sexual assault on them. Now, some of the same people who are touting the veracity of Herman Cain's accusers are pleading we should not believe the children Sandusky victimized. Something really smells rancid with a few of these posters trying to dissemble what is in the Grand Jury Presentments.

One further note: Sanduskuy is the only legitimate source for the names of those he victimized, since the names have been sealed by the court, so the sleazy lawyer who had NBC's help tonight issued a threat that other victims could be 'outed' soon. NBC is as low on the gutter scale as any traiters to American could be. But those trying to defend this sexual predator and his sleazy lawyer are pushing for vermin status.

[GAgal]

I think the evidence gathered regarding Sandusky’s pursuit of Victim 1 will be very powerful. The boy entered high school and tried to end contact with Sandusky, but Sandusky aggressively stalked him via numerous calls to his home, showing up at his school and having him called out of study hall to meet with him, etc. This is stalker behavior imo, and adds credence to his claims, which include the wrestling coach’s eye witness account of finding them lying face to face together in the weight room “practicing wrestling moves” according to the startled Sandusky.

[Boogieman]

Sandusky didn’t admit to a sex act with a child per se, because the incident in question wasn’t purported to be a sex act by the accuser. It was more a case of inappropriate sexual touching, and that is what Sandusky basically admitted to, although when pressed about the most damning detail he said he “wasn’t sure” whether or not it happened.

[fortheDeclaration]

Gee,and I guess being in the shower with a young boy in the middle of the night, at the University, doesn't seem odd to you?

Just a little quirky?

Having a little harmless fun with a naked 10 yr old?

Open your eyes and read the GJ report.

[IamConservative]

For example, we were told many times that sandusky “admitted” what he did in the shower, but wasn’t prosecuted.

One thing I would note having listened to the interview with Sandusky last night. As w/ Michael Jackson, I think Sandusky's thoughts are so perverted, he doesn't even know that playing naked in the shower with 10 year old boys is wrong. I believe he thinks his "affection" is paternal.