Thanks.
Why are we trying to destroy someone before he even finishes speaking and before we even evaluate what he has to say.
Are we that far gone?
No, we know what he has to say and we know he is an agent to purposely harm Herman Cain.
Because whenever Cain waits, he is accused of being unworthy because he should have reacted quicker. Getting the information out there means that it might be used.
Are you really that naive?
Why are you rushing to defend a fraudulent accuser? An accuser with a documented Court record history of fraud?
Have you no shame?
No sense of decency?
Have you fallen so far you would rather cling to a transparent smear attack in the vain notion it helps your candidate of choice rather then defend truth?
Cain was accused. He refuted. NOW more accusations, with not a single shred of proof, are being trotted out.
A rational ADULT would say "hmm, before we hear any more accusations, I think I need to see some proof'
However YOU would rather ignore the proof and cling to the accusation so you attack those documenting the questions about the accuser's veracity and motivations. Shameful and childish are the nicest things that can be said about your conduct.
Are we that far gone? <<
Actually I was thinking the same thought!.....but it was about your critical thinking skills!!!!!......Jeez!
Have u read the evidence on here?????
Really...Are u that far gone???