Don't play word games with me. You know exactly what I meant. I was asking you to stop butting in on other discussions for the sole purpose of attacking other Republican candidates.
You want to start your own thread, preferably with an article that supports your position? You've been around long enough to know that's the original purpose of this site. And you can discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the candidate of your choice.
Well gee I’m sorry for interrupting the bashing.
If you are going to stick your nose in another discussion and open with attacks on the people that are participating, you should expect them to respond in kind.
And when it happens, you have no right to whine about it. You invited it. So, start acting like an adult and take responsibility for the consequences of your actions.
And there it was attacks on the man and he wasn’t even done with his statement. What did Cain do send out talking points?
The original poster discovered the name early, presumably from the Chicago TV station's article that leaked it before the press conference. From there, it was only a simple web search to find a court case that described past questionable behavior on the part of the accuser.
And if you were listening to the press conference, you would have have heard the accuser confirm nearly everything that was posted: he filed for bankruptcy, and moved from Chicago to Louisiana afterward. He operates a pediatric practice and is the medical director for a boxox clinic. Of course, he left out that little tidbit about gambling away the proceeds from sale of his practice in Illinois.
If someone makes accusations impugning the character of another person, then they should expect questions about their own character -- especially if there is absolutely no evidence of what occurred. Right now, we have nothing more than "she said", "he said", and another "he said". Of those three, one has to decide which one to believe. And right now, it's not looking good for two out of the three.
I know you want to believe them, but their past behavior gives you no reason to do so -- other than you want to believe. But yet, you are willing to discount anything Cain says to the contrary, despite no evidence to support you.
And when confronted about it, you responded by launching into personal attacks on Cain. Are you not seeing the pattern here?
Please put a disclaimer on the post that you want reserved for only people that agree with you.
That way the rest of us will know to avoid any thread that you are on.
Thank you in advance.
Cain is STILL inexperienced and unqualified to even be in the primaries.