“Except that girlie men, like this one seems to be, that hide behind their government connections are leftists.”
While I wouldn’t go so far as to call him a “girlie man,” this certainly is a leftist practice. I find it sad that the Soros funded OWS people (Republican or not) have overshadowed the millions of people who have a legitimate concerns over what Republicans are calling “crony capitalism.” The fact is that Government is making shady deals behind our backs. And the Liberal elitists have succeeded in getting everyone who is upset at that to be labelled as “fringe” and as OWS “trash.” So the elitists have succeeded in getting the “right” to oppose anyone (in this case violently) who calls out the shady banker/government deals as OWS trash, while simultaneously getting the “leftists” to hate and have contempt (and in some cases, be violent) against the “right” who have the same concerns over “crony capitalism.” It’s the exact same thing, but the two groups will fight each other, because everyone has to be on a “team.”
Useful idiots are being played against each other, when in fact the problem IS socialism. But that’s to intense a topic for this simple back-patting thread.
I guess that there’s a reason “divide and conquer” is still around...it works so well.
Bogus argument. "This case" was not violent. The disruptor was physically removed from the venue, but he was not beaten up, stabbed, shot, bloodied, nicked, kicked or bruised. Though his sweatshirt was probably wrinkled.
I do find it interesting that you say that "in some cases" the left is violent, while you declare that this instance of the leftist being removed from the ceremony he tried to disrupt was an act of violence from the right.
I'm not buying what you are selling.