Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee

OK, what’s the difference? I’ve seen several suggested.

1. one was pre-pubescent (no pubic hair - I think this was pedophilia) vs. post-pubescent (pubic hair - I think this was pederasty).

2. pederasty = boys only; pedophilia = boys or girls

3. pederasty = statutory rape
pedophilia = anything up to that point.
(linguistically this is the most defensible)


118 posted on 11/13/2011 10:41:43 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: scrabblehack

Close enough. The key point is that the sodomites HATE when the term “pederast” is used, because it means there is a blur between “normal” (sic) adult homosexuality, and “deviant” pedophilia.

Pederasts are the bridge. Adult homosexuals overtly decry the Sanduskies while secretly applauding them, for having the “courage” (in terms of risking prison) to corrupt young boys, and send them on a trajectory where many will be available for homosexual sex later on.

The pederasts feed this sick, evil cyle, to the benefit of adult homosexuals.

That’s why I always distinguish between pedophiles, who are already condemned by one and all, and pederasts, who feed and sustain the homosexual pipeline with new victims.


132 posted on 11/13/2011 11:30:26 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson