You are hopeless. Again, bluster and distortion. And I guess it is condescending to point out that you are not merely uninformed, but intellectually very, very lazy. You seem to think you are entitled to information “room service” beyond the ample information given to you which could have been used by you to check further.
Here is Mohler affirming exactly what Allen said he said in Phoenix. You probably won’t notice the spin (or understand how he is spinning it) after his initial response to Lumpkins’ question: http://peterlumpkins.typepad.com/peter_lumpkins/al-mohler-on-homophobes-in-the-sbc.html
You could have easily found this yourself.
Even more comical is your writing to Mohler as if a response would be equivalent to a message from Mt. Sinai.
Condescending to point out that you are uninformed, but intellectuall very, very lazy.
Not really, but then again, why point out the condescending remarks? Judging by your posts, you wouldnt admit any wrongdoing regardless.
Intellectually lazy? I visited both links you provided before the Lumpkins video. I also reread Dr. Mohlers articles. I never dismissed any of your accusations, but sought proof. Youre the individual who accused Dr. Mohler of lying, not I. So the burden of proof squares with you. Youre crying about very, very lazy while saying, You could have easily found this yourself when all you had to do was search and post a link? Whos being very, very lazy? Its a good thing youre not a prosecuting attorney. I can see you now, standing in front of the jury box.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the defendant is guilty because I said so. I rest my case.
I am unable to view the video at the link from my home pc. I will actually take the time out to drive to an internet café located quite a distance from our home (we live in remote America) and view the video.
Mt. Sinai? Not at all. Just a response from a mere mortal. I told myself, Even if Dr. Mohler was to respond, achilles2000 would accuse him of lying in his email.” Your Mt. Sinai remark is a classic indicator.