I understood your reasons for highlighting the Convention, etc. I was seeking information, as you well know, concerning Dr. Mohler specifically.
Hero-worship? Please don’t flatter yourself. Name calling may provide you with a sense of superiority and justification because you disagree with me, but that doesn’t change the fact that you’ve displayed as much Christian charity as the Pharisees. Nice deflection.
Someone disagrees with you because you call Dr. Mohler a liar (despite the fact that you can’t produce ONE piece of evidence to substantiate your accusation), and you accuse them of hero worship? Basically you’re saying, “Dr. Mohler’s a liar despite what he writes about, and I’m telling the truth. Believe me because I’ve attended these Annual Meetings and the Convention”.
Well, until I here a response from Dr. Mohler I can either take your word for it or his, or wait and see.
I have no doubt that your allegations concerning some of the leaders are legitimate.
I have read my posts. I have read your ad hominem and condescending attacks. I guess your self-righteous indignation is justified. After all, you’ve attended the meetings.
TJI
First, I told you specifically that Mohler was supporting the GCR. That is specific, and apparently you don’t understand the seriousness of that. There is more, but pointing anything further out is not worth the effort.
Second, you are very free with invective while accusing me of doing what you began and continue to do. You might consider that there is an element of projection there.
Third, I have not called Mohler a “liar”, as you put it. Falsely attributing things to others doesn’t help your case. Mohler has gone way off the tracks with the GCR and the “homophobia” slur, which he has subsequently tried to walk back. There are things that could be constructively changed in the Convention, but weakening the Cooperative Program and inching (or galloping in some instances) in the direction of social liberalism aren’t among them.
I don’t think Mohler is malicious, but I do think that he has become too focused on what he sees as the needs of his institution and I know that he really doesn’t understand the sodomite problem in our culture because he doesn’t understand sodomites or the lifestyle.
If this were a more rational exchange we would be agreeing that Mohler has done a lot of good in the Convention but has recently made some serious errors in judgment that endanger Southern, the Convention, and the people who look to him for guidance.