Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
It was observable evidence-an eyewitness saw them.

It is up to the police to decide if the suspicion is reasonable based on factual evidence and deserves more attention.

In this case it did.

66 posted on 11/12/2011 6:34:12 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
It is up to the police to decide if the suspicion is reasonable based on factual evidence and deserves more attention.

In this case, suspicion had nothing to do with it. There were eyewitnesses to at least two incidents: one of Sandusky in the shower with a young boy and the other an actual rape of a young boy.

Actual suspicion is based on very little in the way of observable evidence Suspicion is hunches and impressions based on suggestive evidence such as behavior or coincidences, and not eyewitness evidence to a crime or highly inappropriate behavior.

71 posted on 11/13/2011 9:15:21 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson