Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NewinTexsas
I am starting to understand. Because you 'left' you have the right to speak on this issue. You didn't fix the situation, you left. But we have no right to speak on this issue because we have actually seen a boy getting raped. Gotcha. It makes complete sense, sort of.

It wasn't a sex situation...it was a technical situation...the managment preferred to release a product with fully validating it. They are now paying for that because customer won't buy the product. I felt we could have solved some of the issues before releasing it...so I left and went to a competitor. Their loss..my new company's gain.

227 posted on 11/11/2011 6:08:51 PM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]


To: NRG1973
It wasn't a sex situation...it was a technical situation...the managment preferred to release a product with fully validating it.

Was fraud involved? Were laws broken? Was it a private company or a public company where it affected shareholders.

Sounds like a it was a business decision and you left because you weren't compatible with their manangement style.

Using your logic, I henceforth declare that you are not qualified to speak on the subject of McQueary and his responses to the situation.

229 posted on 11/11/2011 6:13:52 PM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson