Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kackikat

Several days ago, posters put 2+2=4 about the timing of Sandusky’s retirement related to the 1998 investigation. There is no direct evidence, yet.


46 posted on 11/11/2011 1:30:24 PM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: NewinTexsas

This whole thing is going to blow up in Penn State’s face, if the rumor is true....even so it will be years for anyone to trust a sports department again, where young children are concerned.
WHY Sandusky wasn’t told never to come back to the facilities on campus is beyond me, in 1998...then the shower incident seen in 2002, at what point do they get it?? Evidently, there is some reason the college did NOT reprimand beyond his 1998 retirement. That, in and of itself, is highly suspicious.


48 posted on 11/11/2011 3:14:26 PM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson