Skip to comments.
EPA Finds Compound Used in Fracking in Wyoming Aquifer
http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/earthquake-natural-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-fracking/11/10/2011/id/37872?camp=syndication&medium=portals&from=yahoo ^
Posted on 11/11/2011 8:12:03 AM PST by chessplayer
As the country awaits results from a nationwide safety study on the natural gas drilling process of fracking, a separate government investigation into contamination in a place where residents have long complained that drilling fouled their water has turned up alarming levels of underground pollution.
A pair of environmental monitoring wells drilled deep into an aquifer in Pavillion, Wyo., contain high levels of cancer-causing compounds and at least one chemical commonly used in hydraulic fracturing,
(Excerpt) Read more at minyanville.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fracking; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-147 next last
To: stormer
Are you a consultant for one of these frivolous lawsuit mills?
81
posted on
11/11/2011 9:00:08 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Of all of the quadrillions of barrels of oil that the earth has produced, and is still producing I might add, only a small fraction of it is trapped into what we call fields. The rest, Heaven forbid, makes it to the surface due to buoyancy and is a naturally-occuring substance. Ever seen a satellite photo of the Gulf of Mexico on a calm day and seen all of the oil slicks? They ain't from BP.
To: no-s
Oxidane!
Well, that isn’t exactly the DRYEST humor.
83
posted on
11/11/2011 9:01:54 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: chessplayer
Let’s get independent verification as the EPA has an agenda and the current regime a proven track record of falsifying data to fit their agenda.
84
posted on
11/11/2011 9:02:54 AM PST
by
Ingtar
To: HiTech RedNeck
Trouble spots, firms, and people? How about Pavilion, Wyoming area, the EnCana Corporation, and the EPA?
85
posted on
11/11/2011 9:02:56 AM PST
by
stormer
To: no-s
Wow! It’s just as bad as Dihydrogen Monoxide!
There is so much bad stuff out there!
86
posted on
11/11/2011 9:03:42 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
Click the Pic Thank you, JoeProBono
Gary Has Friends in High Places, Thank Goodness!
Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!
Abolish FReepathons -- Go Monthly
If you sign up, a sponsor will donate $10
87
posted on
11/11/2011 9:03:45 AM PST
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: crusty old prospector
To: stormer
Read # 52 and 76 “genius”. You might actually learn something about the subject, while you are so rapidly making a fool of yourself.
And by all means, ask us a few questions, we would love to debat you on our level. Just remember, you had better be able to back it up.
89
posted on
11/11/2011 9:04:48 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: crusty old prospector
While I’m not familiar with the pictures, it was well known that prior to the Gulf spill, much natural oil leaked into the water. Over possibly millions of years, that’s how nature learned how to cope with it. Busting the oil up with detergent and solvent like they did in the Gulf spill hopefully hastened this process, but the natural resources to digest it were already there. By the way what has been going on with the Gulf and the spilled oil, whatever’s left of it?
90
posted on
11/11/2011 9:05:42 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: stormer
Associate together into specific incidents?
91
posted on
11/11/2011 9:06:26 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: Explodo
Any burning questions you want to know about the process? Yeah Dr. Fracenstein, why is Dick Cheney trying to kill all the children and minorities? ;)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Nice to meet someone who thinks that technology is infallible. Those who say that something is "impossible" are invariably the ones who end up with egg on their faces...
93
posted on
11/11/2011 9:08:21 AM PST
by
stormer
To: dblshot
You can bet yer Bippy on that one ;-)
Spent most of my youtuh in the Oklahoma Oil fields. My pops even had a acidizing company until of course the Windfall profits tax sucked the money out of the oil patch back in the late 70’s early 80’s.
94
posted on
11/11/2011 9:08:26 AM PST
by
Explodo
(Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
To: crusty old prospector
95
posted on
11/11/2011 9:10:13 AM PST
by
Explodo
(Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
To: stormer
Nice to meet someone who wants to smear and only under pressure will begin to even approach stating specific events that can then be debated about. It’s hard to debate Judgments from On High, after all, which is Handy for You.
96
posted on
11/11/2011 9:10:32 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Did you happen to read the article? Your stream-of-consciousness posts are causing me to wonder...
97
posted on
11/11/2011 9:11:51 AM PST
by
stormer
To: HiTech RedNeck
Because of that millions of years of seepage, a whole biological system has evolved to consume it. It takes care of itself as quickly as it happens.
The remains of the BP spill were consumed the same way, and much faster than originally estimated. Much like Prince William Sound. The spill cleaned itself up in less than a year.
The damage the cleanup effort did by steaming the rocks and soaping the beaches, etc, did far more damage to the environment than the spill ever thought of doing. I was there on that one also.
98
posted on
11/11/2011 9:13:28 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: stormer
Did you find any independent authority backing up the EPAllegations?
And wonder all you want, we do not care about your wondering. It has no weight here.
99
posted on
11/11/2011 9:13:39 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: McGruff; bamahead; Nervous Tick; SteamShovel; Tunehead54; golux; tubebender; Fractal Trader; ...
Nice graphic.
Based on the prevailing track record of the EPA, I distrust them and can not take any of their claims seriously. I can not think of an exception where any of their claims did not support the far leftist agenda at the expense of the American people. And it is getting worse. And I'll say this. They lie. The EPA lies like Obama, like Holder, like Clinton, Carter, Pelosi, Reid, etc. It's what progressives do.
Beam me to Planet Gore !
100
posted on
11/11/2011 9:15:28 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson