Some of the “detector detractors” on this thread would have been equally skeptical of fingerprints and ballistics 100+ years ago.
Give the new technology a chance. It is not going to be used in a court of law-—at least in Herman’s case.
Still a lot of people are unaware to what degree just their voice is saying about them, I have even heard of a program where an LEO can on the spot use a voice analysis say if you are pulled over and being questioned.
Or say you are in a loan office, that they can make a decision based on how you answer questions.
There isn’t much of a defense unless you are mute. Or you have a dedicated spokesperson.