Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
The same issues we are debating for the crude oil / bitumen pipeline will apply to a gasoline / diesel / Jet fuel pipeline.

Gasoline would need to be delivered to the consumer in, say, Seattle, Denver and Minneapolis, versus bitumen, which currently needs to be delivered to the Gulf refineries. Gasoline transportation issues and costs should be a fraction of bitumen's.

Am I understanding this correctly?

47 posted on 11/11/2011 2:16:16 PM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Kennard

So you would shut down other US refineries to build 500,000 BOD refinery up North?

The US does not have a shortage of refineries, but rather a shortage of feedstock to them.

A refinery produces more than gasoline. The chemical feedstock market is also on the Gulf Coast.

Also byproduct is quite a bit of sulfur. Also the refinery is going to produce petroleum coke or residual oil. There isn’t much market for those on the Canadian / North Dakota border. And those are not moving by pipeline.


48 posted on 11/11/2011 5:10:55 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson