[dinodino]

What in the WORLD are you talking about? Talk about half-baked ideas!

[muawiyah]

Dinodino ~ way in the background we have an ongoing discussion about what might or might not constitute a way of proving or disproving fraud in a process that may or may not involve strong nuclear or weak nuclear (or both) forces.

The North Koreans may be running a real scam ~ producing radionuclides in their half-assed reactor so they can "blow ash" as they detonate their underpowered fake weak bombs to trick our government, and the Chicoms, Russians and Japanese.

Obviously it would be a good idea to have some sort of check list that could be used to JUDGE these events to see which may be fake, or contrived, and what others might have promise.

Did I hear you saying we shouldn't apply such principles to the examination of the North Korean bombs?