“Especially, stop
multiplying invisible entities that cannot be detected by any means, even
in principle.”
Actually, the skeptics have been calling for independent inspection and replication of Rossi’s equipment, precisely for detection of any means he may be using to cheat. He has not allowed peer review of his method. Occam’s Razor dictates that Rossi is cheating and that he has not discovered a new nuclear process.
Occam’s Razor dictates that Rossi is cheating and that he has not discovered a new nuclear process.
***You’re way behind the curve on this one. Occham’s Razor suggests rather than dictates. And it suggests that Rossi is going into business rather than trying to make a scientific case. Peer review in such a strategy is meaningless. Also, Rossi’s contribution has not ever been that he “discovered a new nuclear process.” That was Pons & Fleishmann’s contribution. Rossi’s contribution was that he found a catalyst to make the process more easily repeatable, so much so that he’s going into production and already has sold at least one unit to a customer.