You're sure about a lot of things. The problem with your certainty is that induction heating is one of the "obvious fakes" for this kind of rig. Anybody with a "skeptic" background (and certainly any scientist) would immediately think of it.
And, in your opinion, verbal evidence from a videotape isn't valid?? The law disagrees with you.
I’m sorry, is this a courtroom, or a scientific experiment? It looks like a courtroom, all right: a kangaroo court, with Judge Rossi presiding.
Hydrogen peroxide is an obvious fake as well, and nobody’s tested for that, either—because Rossi won’t let them.
Go ahead and post for us the chemical assay results for the inputs to the experiment, along with some of the many tests that skeptics have suggested. You won’t, because you can’t—Rossi hasn’t allowed these tests to be performed.
The wheels are going to come off Rossi’s scambus fairly soon. So far, he hasn’t failed to disappoint amused skeptics with his antics, and now we hear that he’s selling shares in his invention? WOW, WHAT A SHOCK.
“Anybody with a “skeptic” background (and certainly any scientist) would immediately think of it.”
Can we accept that as your indictment of Jed’s article? Remember, Jed says that he had listed EVERY possible way of getting energy into the Rossi experiment, but somehow forgot magnetic induction...