Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NRG1973

“What was found in the 1998 incident was one incident that Sandusky showered with a boy on the campus of PSU.”

NOT true. The child told everything. Sandusky was ON TAPE in a phone call from the child’s mother ADMITTING it and said he wished he was dead. Gricar HAD that evidence of admission.


50 posted on 11/10/2011 10:50:23 AM PST by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: battletank
“What was found in the 1998 incident was one incident that Sandusky showered with a boy on the campus of PSU.”

NOT true. The child told everything. Sandusky was ON TAPE in a phone call from the child’s mother ADMITTING it and said he wished he was dead. Gricar HAD that evidence of admission.

Where in the grand jury report does it say that Sandusky sexually contacted that boy in that incident?. Nowhere! It says that he showered naked with the kid and bear hugged the kid but it doesn't mention touching the genitals. The difference difference between what Sandusky did and what was needed to prove sexual contact is probably why Gricar chose not to prosecute.

Yeah, what Sandusky did sure as hell was kinky and indicative of a wierd mind but, by itself, not enough to prosecute.

55 posted on 11/10/2011 10:57:30 AM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: battletank

Agree.


79 posted on 12/25/2011 11:27:43 AM PST by Can
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson