Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scoutmaster
What really disturbs me is that when Sandusky was retired in 1999 with no police notification, he was given free rein to continue his horrific acts with gusto.

Evidently Penn State was only concerned about their risk and NOT any harm to children. Otherwise they would have stipulated that he could no longer operate a charitable foundation with unlimited access to......little boys. Considering that he never took another coaching job I have to wonder if that was agreed upon when he "retired".

It's looking like in 1999 Penn State released a predator on into society. It wouldn't surprise me, when all is said & done, if the number of boys ends up at 100 or more. Penn State, you'd better call your banker. I have a feeling you're about to be writing some checks.
6 posted on 11/10/2011 4:41:28 AM PST by Shannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shannon
" It's looking like in 1999 Penn State released a predator on into society. It wouldn't surprise me, when all is said & done, if the number of boys ends up at 100 or more. Penn State, you'd better call your banker. I have a feeling you're about to be writing some checks. "

Yep. I fear the good people of PA who have nothing to do with this are about to lose their university. Right now, high school kids are moving PSU from the top to the bottom of their list. Especially, high school student athletes being recruited by PSU are saying "I ain't going in that shower room, what was that coach from (school x)'s phone number again? Faculty are mulling over staying or going. Donors are reconsidering. And at last count that I heard, 20 victims are in lawyer's offices today talking about how much they're going to sue the fewk out of PSU for. (And 20 is just the tip of the iceberg, according to the smart money. This guy was having camps at PSU campi all over the State for years after...)

33 posted on 11/10/2011 6:20:29 AM PST by OKSooner (Today's new tagline. Tomorrow's new tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shannon
Otherwise they would have stipulated that he could no longer operate a charitable foundation with unlimited access to......little boys. Considering that he never took another coaching job I have to wonder if that was agreed upon when he "retired".

No! There is a word for what you are suggesting and it's blackmail. I doubt that anyone at Penn state stipulated anything, as it would make them not only complicit, but guilty of blackmail as well. Such a stipulation would be highly illegal. Courts may stipulate things like can't coach, can't be around children, but universities cannot.

37 posted on 11/10/2011 6:33:06 AM PST by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson