i dont think so, it’s the exact opposite. i can judge
a character quite well. if we go by body languages,
when lawyer allred gave the intro, look at the video again,
bialek was more than ready to jump into starting her
statement. if a person lies, he/she would not do that.
it is similar to amanda knox’s body language in italian
courts, how passionate she was in trying to prove her
innocence.
the opposite was true, i watched the previous debates
and cain was full of energy; at the presser, his energy
was low, you could detect the context of his voice
and expressions.
after the presser, i think john king interviewed a
cain’s friend on cnn, and he said his wife/family was
not even there at the presser. one could ponder why that is. contrast that to clinton+hillary together
trying their best to b.s. the people when they actually
knew bill did it, i.e. the 60 minutes interview in 1992(?)
Everybody and his brother thinks they are great judges of character. That’s why we have a legal system. We really are not that good at it. Without hard evidence, a person in our system gets a presumption of innocence. You know about the high tech voice analysis that was done on Cain, right? Objective science says he spoke with the voice qualities of a man speaking the truth. Then there’s Coulter’s new piece, showing a clear path to Axelrod as the planner of the hit. This is real war. We have to make the other side work for everything they get. That means we don’t just hand them the ball if they come after us. We stand with our guy, we give him the blocking he needs, and we drag him over the goal line if we have to. This is for the money.
Check out Ms. Bialek’s checkered past. BTW, the “shift” key on the keyboard is your friend.
You would have to suspend all manner of belief to even buy the set up of her story.
First she is working for a lobbying group based in DC but she works in the Chicago office. She works for the office for one year. She has maybe met Cain one time (according to her) at a group dinner.
She is living with her ‘Boy Friend’ A pediatrician who advises her to fly to DC and meet with Mr. Cain. The CEO of the firm. RIGHT! She is able to get ahold of Mr. Cain, I am sure her call would be sent right through by the secretary, All terminated employees are the first call that a CEO takes. She convinces him to meet her, for what reason. She says it is to ask for help with a job. He asks her halfway through dinner ‘why are you here’ (Her words again)
She claims her 'Boy Friend' gets her the room at he Hilton, but Cain upgrades her, HOW. The Hilton would not only not divulge her presence prior to her checking in, they would never tell him what room she was in much less ever allow for him to upgrade a guest of theirs. Just doesn't happen, it is totally against any policy they have ever had. ( I have over a million Hhonors points and have staid in hundreds of Hilton properties during the time period this was to occur. They never divulge info about room numbers and guest suites VS. rooms. NEVER!
She goes to dinner, ALONE, with Cain. Tarted up I am sure. She allows him to drive her away from the hotel where he has supposedly secured an upgraded SUITE in order to drive her to the street or lot outside the local office in order to ‘out the moves on her’ WHY? He has her in a suite. She is obviously;y as dumb as a post she flew 600 miles to talk t the head of a company that just fired her to have her help with a job.
She also has had TWO bankruptcies in ten years and is rumored to be in the process of another, She hasn't had a job in years, lives high on the hog, been involved in many legal fights over money and PATERNITY with more than one person, OVER THE SAME KID. That doesn't sound good.
Attending Physician: Who is the father for the birth certificate.
Buy-A-Lick: Could be one of at least two guys, let me get back to you after my attorney does a financial assessment on them.
As far as her statement was concerned. She related an unbelievable story in a halting manner after being coached by the biggest legal Hack in the country.
For the love of God, I thought Allred’s neck snapped when she heard that ambulance go by!
Total fraud. So is the other ‘aggrieved party’
Really, capitalization is your friend. Try this for body language...what the heck was she doing laughing and talking with the press about her new hairdo. Even her attorney told her to quit talking. Doesn’t show a lot of seriousness for something that she was so traumatized by that event that she remembers everything except the date, restaurant and other specific details (oh she did remember what she was wearing so that’s something).
A person that lies wouldn’t do that? What about that whole finger shaking “I did not have sex with that woman”. That was pretty bold. And why wouldn’t she want to get on with it? If she’s lying she may just want to get through the damn thing so she can get off the stage. There was nothing natural about that. It was like she was reading about something she’d never been a part of...way too much hesitation and an inability to say anything not written down.
I don’t have a clue what Amanda Knox has to do with this and frankly, I can’t even figure out what side you take on this is either. But I’d really like to hear the specific “context” of his voice (whatever that means) and expressions you’re talking about? When? During what part? What was he talking about when you noticed?
Well, Cain said previously, even before this that his wife isn’t going to be the typical campaign wife. She’s not as comfortable as professional political wives and prefers to support her husband in a more traditional way. Good for her. We aren’t electing a first lady, we’re electing a president. Oh, and using Clinton and Hillary for an example...Clinton was guilty (as are almost every guy who trots is wife in front of the camera when he has to admit to being a creep). So, he’s guilty and doesn’t have the support of his wife because she didn’t stand by his side like the wives of MEN WHO WERE GUILTY? That’s some pretty twisted logic there.
Cindie
It is not often I have experience of hearing from some one who is obviously DUMBER THAN A BOX OF ROCKS; but I must say, your ability to interpret body language is only surpassed by your skills at reading tea leaves, or maybe chicken entrails.
If a person lies...they might use a script (crib notes) to outling events which allegedly they recall from 15 years ago. If they are telling the truth, why the crib sheet?
I can has shift key?
I hate to burst your Cain Bashing bubble, but......
Investigator: Herman Cain innocent of sexual advances
"The software analyzes the stress level and other factors in your voice. During the speech, when Cain denied the claims, the lie detector read "low risk." According to Ward, that means Cain is telling the truth. "
"During the analysis of that section the software said "high risk statement." Ward said that means she is not telling the truth about what happened. "
"Ward said nearly 70 law enforcement agencies nationwide use the voice software, including the Forsyth County Sheriff's Office.
Ward said the technology is a scientific measure that law enforcement use as a tool to tell when someone is lying and that it has a 95 percent success rate.
After listening to Cain's speech and analyzing it, Ward said there is no doubt, Cain is innocent. "
Now that right there shows how little merit your thoughts have. Every politician in trouble trots out the family/wife to make a good picture. Cain didn't do that. If anything, that indicates there's nothing there.
You write like a child with the speculative intellect of a high school sophomore. Pathetic.