All of this because the world saw the rattletraps that rolled into Georgia and half the Rooskie military supplies burned up in a forest fire?
To: bruinbirdman
2 posted on
11/08/2011 9:54:20 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: bruinbirdman
The Russian Army has traditionally relied on brute force and Russia’s advantage in manpower to win a war. The Russian Army has been slow to transform into a smaller, mobile and professional volunteer army. Changing the mindset of the Soviet time is no easy task in modern Russia.
3 posted on
11/08/2011 9:58:40 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: bruinbirdman
Just recruiting soldiers who don’t drink hydraulic fluid would be “a new look” for Russian military...
To: bruinbirdman
>>> All of this because the world saw the rattletraps that rolled into Georgia and half the Rooskie military supplies burned up in a forest fire?
No. All this because George H Bush and George W Bush gave the world demonstrations of what modern war actually look like.
6 posted on
11/08/2011 10:21:13 PM PST by
tlb
To: bruinbirdman
What was wrong with the old Russian Army look?
8 posted on
11/09/2011 12:29:25 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson