Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

Do you think Thomas Jefferson thought an embryo was a man?

In 1776 people didn’t even know how fertilization worked; there were people that thought sperm contained an entire embryo well into the 19th century.

So do you think Thomas Jefferson thought a spermatozoa was a man?


71 posted on 11/08/2011 8:59:21 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

Oh go torch your strawmen somewhere private. This didn’t cover spermatazoa.


74 posted on 11/08/2011 9:01:45 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist; Antoninus
Considering the fact that during a fire, the liquid nitrogen dewars (For starters) would be compromised, thus spoiling the embryos, your strawman makes no sense at all; especially if a lay person was the only person outside the fire.

The layman/woman would save the 10 year old unless you had several dozen females who are sanitized after ovulating for a couple of days, MDs at the ready who are screaming at you in order to retrieve the embryos, and multiple other controlled environmental factors impervious in a situation involving a fire.
152 posted on 11/09/2011 6:56:12 PM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson