There you go again.
“Thinking” doesn’t mean coming up with the most implausible and extreme scenarios to justify your position.
You should just come out and say it. You are in favor of any mother (assuming they aren’t being pressured by a man or “doctor” at the clinic) being able to kill her “unborn” (which Peter Singer and your other friends would assail as a horrible limitation itself, they want to be able to abort AFTER birth too) baby at any time for any reason.
Funny how implausible and extreme laws lead to implausible or extreme scenarios.
So, do you have an answer? I mean, if it's two 1 year old babies vs. 1 10 year old girl, I'll take the babies out of the burning building. I wouldn't be happy about it but it's better than letting all three burn.
But I'm not even considering carting the cooler full of embryos out of the burning building, and you, or ANY poster on this thread, wouldn't consider it either.
Admit it. When the chips are down, and it really would matter, nobody ACTUALLY thinks a fertilized egg is a person or would treat it as such.