Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The weird headline is at the source, not a goof-up by me.

Anyone who thinks Chris Christie has a better shot at the Republican nomination than Sarah Palin is smoking better dope than the richest trustafarian at Zuccotti Park!

1 posted on 11/08/2011 12:17:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve said from the beginning that she was my candidate until the time that she decided not to run. Why would my opinion change if she runs?


26 posted on 11/08/2011 12:38:16 PM PST by Dr. Thorne (Fall on your knees before Christ, your only salvation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She could not. It would have required her being in the race to begin with.

Stupid writer.


27 posted on 11/08/2011 12:39:26 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We have a very viable front runner in Herman Cain. I just sent him another $100 today. Don’t the enemy with false charges take that away from the Country. Help Herman Cain by sending him your patriotic best check at:

Herman Cain, Inc.
Friends of Herman Cain, Inc.
P.O. Box 2158
Stockbridge, Georgia 30281

And God bless America!

Sarah can ber in charge of the Energy Dept.!


29 posted on 11/08/2011 12:39:29 PM PST by Paperdoll (I like Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If she makes it to the ballot, I’ll vote for her.

If RINOmney makes it to the ballot, guess I’ll just have to leave the president portion unmarked.


30 posted on 11/08/2011 12:39:48 PM PST by Da Coyote (Liberalism - when you absolutely, positively have no ability to produce wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Whether she does or doesn’t, I won’t be voting for her or anyone else other than Herman Cain.

If America destroys this decent man, then America destroys itself as far as I am concerned.

I HAVE HAD ENOUGH.


31 posted on 11/08/2011 12:40:45 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Answer: Yes.


32 posted on 11/08/2011 12:42:18 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Nonsense.

I was a Palin supporter but when she declined to run I switched my allegiance to Herman Cain and there it remains. Although I still admire her, by sitting on the sidelines Sarah Palin has diminished in importance for most conservatives. I'm not sure why Sarah Palin decided not to run. It could have been the fact that she was accused of having sex with some athlete while in college, which, while hardly making her ineligible to run for the Republican nomination, would be an embarrassing revelation for a Christian mother of five and enough to persuade her not to run. Or, it could be that she simply didn't want to deal with the kind of Chicago gutter politics the Obama people would have used on her - and her family.

One look at the garbage being dumped on Herman Cain (accusations of misbehavior with no witnesses. Accusations he can only deny but can probably never disprove) is proof that the GOP presidential nominee will be covered head to toe in manure from the Obama campaign. Even the Democrat's favorite Republican, Mitt Romney, will get 'the Chicago treatment'. What else can Obama do? He has no record of achievement in office and bragging about killing Osama bin Laden won't cut it for most people. Although, in politics, anything can happen, I don't believe that Sarah Palin will be running for president in 2012.

33 posted on 11/08/2011 12:42:49 PM PST by Jim Scott (on the 'Cain Train')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse

ping


34 posted on 11/08/2011 12:43:00 PM PST by nutmeg (Yes We CAIN !! Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Answer: Yes.

Palin/Cain in 2012


35 posted on 11/08/2011 12:43:04 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s amazing to me that she has remained quiet throughout all of this.


38 posted on 11/08/2011 12:44:39 PM PST by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oh please.

This is a filthy Presidential election, not a soap opera.

If Sarah Palin couldn't handle the bogus attacks as governor of Alaska, what makes any rational person think she can deal with the high altitude $hit-slinging of a Presidential campaign? She's doing great on the stump. Give it a rest and let her be.

43 posted on 11/08/2011 12:48:57 PM PST by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

give it up people

She’s never going to run.

EVER!


44 posted on 11/08/2011 12:49:23 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Her name will either be on the ballot or written on the ballot. She raised the bar that no other candidate has reached.


47 posted on 11/08/2011 1:00:27 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why didn't you just bump this nearly identical redundant thread?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2802665/posts

I am beginning too think the Palin bots like to argue and can't stand missing a day not calling someone deranged because they are.

48 posted on 11/08/2011 1:01:57 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Awwww jeez not this shit again


49 posted on 11/08/2011 1:03:16 PM PST by SpringtoLiberty (Liberty is on the march!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
SP is the ONLY (potential) GOP candidate who has been vetted, vetted again, then re-vetted. She's had the media colonoscopy (please excuse the disturbing imagery) that NONE of the others have.

IF Cain falls, either by the drip-drip of MSM stories OR by his own (so-far) not-ready-for-primetime handling, each of the remaining candidates will be subject to the same procedure BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T BEEN THROUGH THE MEDIA WRINGER that Gov. Palin has.

I also doubt that she'll join the race; but fervently pray that I'm wrong.

50 posted on 11/08/2011 1:05:58 PM PST by LaybackLenny (All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No. What tripe.


51 posted on 11/08/2011 1:13:13 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; rabscuttle385; bigdaddy45; reaganaut; stephenjohnbanker; mkjessup; calcowgirl; ...
RE :”Things are so bad for the GOP and/or Republicans are so turned off by the idea that Mitt Romney is their only viable option rumors have once again surfaced that Sarah Palin could get back in the race.

She was in the race?? Only in some imaginative heads. But I do miss the daily drama LOL

Photobucket

65 posted on 11/08/2011 4:23:11 PM PST by sickoflibs (Cain :"My parents didn't raise me to beg the government for other peoples money")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner; indylindy; Pan_Yans Wife; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; rabscuttle385; Impy; ...
Hey, you have a Palin wish party going here and I didnt get pinged till #65 ?

We need these threads every so often so we can get together and share fond memories of Palin WH fantasy train.

Remember the Bus tour, and the Iowa passion video, and ‘the Undefeated ‘ (renamed ‘the Unwilling’ LOL), and those expiring ethics charges and hiring the advisers (wink, wink), and the ‘I can win’ Newsweek cover in the running suit??
Man it was a fun ride.

67 posted on 11/08/2011 4:47:41 PM PST by sickoflibs (Cain :"My parents didn't raise me to beg the government for other peoples money")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
One major constraint is that the filing deadline has already passed in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida. So a candidate who entered now could not get her name on the ballot in those states, although some states, like New Hampshire, allow for write-in votes. /i>

Consider this:

1. Romney is stuck at 25%...and unlikely to go higher.

2. Cain was touching 30% and, while his supporters seem determined to stick by him, the sexual harrassment BS probably caps him at that level.

3. Gingrich is creeping up toward 15%.

4. Ron Paul is going to get 10% of the vote -- whether he deserves it or not.

5. Don't know/don't care/Bachman, Santorum, Johnson, Huntsman, etc. amount to the remainder.

Unlike 2008, when the early primary states employed a "winner take all" system, this time around most are employing a proportional distribution of delegates. Remember that McCain locked up his candidacy before he ever won a majority of primary voters. That won't happen again.

So, what happens if we go thru January (i.e., Florida)...and still don't have a nominee? The probability is that we'll arrive at the convention...and still not have a nominee.

Then what?

We haven't confronted this situation in decades. 1960 was probably the last time that a convention actually named the nominee (JFK).

But, given a deadlocked Republican convention, with three legitimate contenders, what happens? Be aware that most primaries bind the delegates through the first ballot only, some thru the second. None thru the third.

In 1924, the Democrats nominated John W. Davis...on the 104th ballot.

Given a stage ruled by the establishment...and a floor controlled by the Tea Party...anything could happen.

Maybe Karl Rove gets mugged on the floor between the 5th and 6th ballot. And could somebody nominate Sarah Palin on the 7th ballot...???

Damn straight.

69 posted on 11/08/2011 4:56:45 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson