You and others are claiming Paterno willfully turned a blind eye to this abuse. Your argument is basically that Paterno knows everything so if he wanted to stop it he could have.
You and others are saying or implying that Paterno is escaping prosecution solely in return for his testimony.
Your saying that Paterno could have kept Sandusky from using the facilities despite the fact he had a contracted right to use them.
You seem to be saying that he turned the investigation over the A.D. because he knew they would cover it up.
No, I'm not defending Penn State. In fact, I think it's a crap school. But I do think there are a group of self-righteous blowhards out looking to destroy a basically decent guy regardless of what the facts are. I think it's OK to point that out.
You can drop the ‘seem to be’