[mnehring]

The doc you saw was a financial judgement against her. It wasn’t that David Axelrod and he wasn’t her attorney, he was the attorney for the lending company who was suing her. She doesn’t have an attorney listed on that doc.
(she also had a summary judgment against her and just this past September, had an asset seizure order against her..)

[bcsco]

There are also two court cases dating back to 1999, one initiated by her, the other a month later by her defendant, Naze West. They were both PET (Parent Establishment Test) cases. Her’s was swallowed up into his in 2003 or so, and his was ongoing for several more years. Paternity, child support (from her, apparently), that type of thing. I suspect he went after her and won, perhaps because he could better provide a home. If so, and if he has the child, how is she a stay-at-home mom?

[piasa]

The doc you saw was a financial judgement against her. It wasn’t that David Axelrod and he wasn’t her attorney, he was the attorney for the lending company who was suing her. She doesn’t have an attorney listed on that doc. (she also had a summary judgment against her and just this past September, had an asset seizure order against her..)

Thanks for the clarification. Different guy.

[XenaLee]

In other words, she is desperate for money.

Or....

she WAS.

When the Reps take back the WH next year, I think it would be nice to have the IRS look into her “finances”....right about now. Just out of curiosity.