Replies

Um.. the evidence that is beyond question is a woman was paid a large sum of money to shut up about Cain... now you can spin that as just someone trolling for cash, but that’s a fact.

Fact, Cain said no money was paid out to women.. now this is not true. MOney was paid, he claimed ignorance, which is possible, but as I said if he wants to be president he should have KNOWN this was out there.

Fact Cain, accused another republican of being the leaker of this information, INCORRECTLY.

Cain has not looked for one minute like he’s in control of this situation, hes handled it beyond poorly. He should have known about this and should have had answers ready, he didn’t.

Who knows if any of the rest of these allegations are true or not, but Cain has handled this as an rank amateur, and we already have one of those in the white house IMHO we don’t need another one.

So you dropped the little issue of whether he is guilty or not and now solely focused on he didn't handle it well?

Great. Listen armchair QB, when the whole world rains down on you with false allegations and scumbags crawl out from under rocks to accuse you and ruin your career, family, and life, then get back to me with how perfect you handled it, ok?

I don't buy for a minute Cain's handling of it is your issue. You just hope your guy (whoever it is) gains from this witch hunt.

Fact, Cain said no money was paid out to women

You and I have gone over this before and you still misstate the facts. Cain's statement related to himself. HE never paid any money to the woman. That is a true statement. He was not a signatory to the agreement. He, in fact, disputed the allegation. His not being a signatory means that he was not held accountable. You state this stuff again and you will be piling on lies.

Fact Cain, accused another republican of being the leaker of this information, INCORRECTLY.

Fact, a pollster for Perry stated publicly he was there at one of these so-called events. That gives reason to question whether Perry's campaign was involved.

Cain has not looked for one minute like he’s in control of this situation, hes handled it beyond poorly.

That's because Cain has NOT been in control of events; he's been overtaken by events. Politico refused to tell him what the facts were before they were published so he was working in the dark. Not being a signatory to the agreement indicates he wasn't aware of the facts of the agreement so have no information with which to counter the allegations.

You accuse Cain of handling this as a rank amateur. You're handling it as a hit piece against Cain, even after being corrected by myself and others. We now all know your bias. It's clear for all to see.

"the evidence that is beyond question is a woman was paid a large sum of money to shut up about Cain..". No, Cain didn't even work there anymore. They paid to get rid of a vindictive backbiting whiner in their office before she poisoned the whole place and made NRA a living hell. Stop jumping to conclusions. This stuff happens all the time.