Posted on 11/07/2011 10:55:06 AM PST by reegs
I thought he was the DEFENDENT in the paternity case!
PET TO ESTABLISH PARENTAGE?
******
West Naze
EVP/National Sales Manager at News America Marketing
Location
Greater Chicago Area
Industry
Marketing and Advertising
West Naze’s Overview
Current •EVP/National Sales Manager at News America Marketing
Past •Marketing Manager at Dean Foods
Education •St. Norbert College
Connections 500+ connections
West Naze’s Experience
EVP/National Sales Manager News America Marketing Privately Held; 501-1000 employees; Marketing and Advertising industry
September 2006 – Present (5 years 3 months)
Marketing Manager Dean Foods Public Company; 10,001+ employees; DF; Dairy industry
May 1987 – November 1988 (1 year 7 months)
West worked directly with all retail brand teams and the Director of Marketing on all advertising, promotion and trade programs. West also served as the liason between the sales organization and brand managers. West worked with the Director of Marketing and outside agencies in the production & development of radio and TV commercials.
******
Filing Date: 10/22/1999 Case Type: PET TO ESTABLISH PARENTAGE (NON-IV-D)
Division: Domestic Relations Division District: First Municipal
Ad Damnum: $0.00 Calendar: 99
Party Information
Plaintiff(s) Attorney(s)
BIALEK SHARON RUCHIM MITCHELL B
3000 DUNDEE RD#415
NORTHBROOK IL, 60062
(847) 272-2800
Date of Service Defendant(s) Attorney(s)
NAZE WEST
Does one of those cases show she was ordered to parenting classes....or am I reading it wrong?
This is why you never, ever, ever meet with a woman in private, or ride in a care with one, or anything that would put you and her alone together. Not because we’d do something bad, but because she can say we did.
James Gregory played the bufoon Senator who complains to wife Angela Lansbury that she keeps changing the number of communists that he's threatening to expose in his daily press appearance, and he can't keep the number straight. Can't she just give him one number to remember?
Lansbury yells back to him, Idiot, I give you one simple thing to do, can't you just do it? While you keep changing the number of communists in government, the press will report the changing number instead of looking elsewhere into other things that are going on. It's no longer "are their communists in government, it's how many communists are there?"
That's what the Leftist MSM is doing to Cain.
The script is now "Is it one woman, two women, four women, more? It's no longer "Did he do it?"
-PJ
Right, but here’s the problem:
If Cain reached for her genitals and she objected, the character of the account suggests he would have stopped right there. So if there is a sequence in place, methinks that he would have never got to the part where he was trying to shove her face in his crotch because she would have already been putting up a fight/objecting.
The one struggle shows in his link in post#572 shows Naze West as plaintiff. It’s dated 11/29/1999. Yours is a month earlier. He evidently filed a counter suit.
The whole thing would be more plausable in a backseat situation where he is turned toward her with his left arm on her left and his right arm already on her shoulder which he then uses to push her head toward his crotch.
But without first having his right arm over her shoulder the whole situation seems way to awkward for someone to make a pass.
Even if all of this is true it shows he has character flaws. This is ok. He’s running for President, not Son of God.
Personally I do not think all the nasty intimate sexual details of someone like Cain are any of my business. I don't care about them. But there does seem to be a lot of interest by so called conservatives on FR as to which hand went up her skirt or how was he going to get his zipper opened. Talk about getting into the gutter with the Marxist Tabloid Media, lol. yall have at it and don't forget to drag Newt or whoever into the circular firing squad the left has served up for you. Fools, you deserve Obama.
We have at least one case to “Establish Parentage”. OK. What does THAT mean? Do we not know who the father is of one or more of her children?
she sued him for parentage... probably trolling for $$$ that case was consolidated with this case
where he turned the tides on her and sued her with a lawyer he looks like he got tested (appoint special deputy?) after which he filed for child support from her and she objected? then he filed for medical support and custody? and ordered her to pay for him and his lawyers. she filed intorragatories? and then her name suddenly becomes SHARON NAZE (she married him to have the suit dismissed?) then he orders her to family counseling? and then he files for her to go through all the payments AGAIN and then a separate time.
Someone with legal experience needs to research this... its pretty engaging.
“Not because we’d do something bad, but because she can say we did.”
She doesn’t even have to be in the room or the car, and she can STILL say that you did something. Won’t hold up in a court of law - but it sure will grab the headlines in a presidential race.
I have no idea what you are talking about, how can you prepare for something that didn’t happen? or prepare to rebut lies that you haven’t heard?
There’s a few Axelrods in Chicago, one of them was my Alderman back in the late 1970’s, no relation. IIRC, Obama’s David Axelrod is not originally from Chicago.
someone with a direct line to herman cain needs to mail him this post #592 he and his investigator could use it!
The candidates have to be perfect or you will be unhappy, is that it? You will not be happy with a candidate until Jesus Christ Himself runs for office, is that it?
shame on you!
/s
see how easy that was?
and I can do it again with 3 others just as easily, and if I drug a dollar bill through a trailer park I could probably get some publicity ho to even come forward on camera to make accusations (while laughing)
Supposedly, he had upgraded her hotel room to some gigantic suite. Why would he “go for it” in the car?
Anybody but Newt huh, lol. FYI, newt did not lead the impeachment of Clinton, in fact he was against it (and he was right) but the House GOP was overwhelming in favor so Newt "washed his hands" and let them go for it. The house GOP lost some of their best abd brightest in the huge public back lash as a result. The Marxists left no stone unturned in a witch hunt that continues to this very day (Cain) because of that impeachment. You sadly have fallen into their trap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.