Good grief! Are you guys for real?!?! Frankly, if it's "Perry's stance", then he should be thanking Cain and Gingrich for speaking it for him, since he obviously can't articulate anything for himself.
I was 100% undecided and open-minded going into the debates. The only stances of Perry's I learned: 1. Texas made a lot of jobs. 2. Conservatives are heartless. 3. He puts life first. 4. Romney is bad. It seems to me he was asked a lot of other questions, but for the life of me it was hard to pay attention through the stuttering to figure out what he was saying.
I am now 100% closed-minded on Perry. My bar wasn't set high. Though I have preferences on the others now, I'm still 100% open to, in alpha order, Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich and Santorum. I will vote for the person I judge the better of the top two contenders when it's time for CA to vote. So if the rest of the party says it's between Perry and Romney, then that MA RINO is the only one Perry would have had to beat out for my vote. But now, after seeing that my Shetland Sheepdog could do better in a debate than Perry, I'd even prefer Romney over him. I'm not worried about making that choice though, because the polls and FR comments make it very obvious that most Republican voters have come to a similar opinion about Perry.
"Frankly, if it's 'Perry's stance,' then he should be thanking Cain and Gingrich for speaking it for him, since he obviously can't articulate anything for himself."
Wish I'd have thought of that myself!
and
"But now, after seeing that my Shetland Sheepdog could do better in a debate than Perry..."
I propose that Texas Tea Party sponsor another one of these events: My Yorkie against your Shetland Sheepdog. Your Sheepdog may be smart but my Yorkie is cunning and relentless!
Hank