Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG

I’m 100% with you that his 2008 endorsement is not something to hold against him. However, you are falling into a somewhat common trap of ignoring what Cain actually SAYS and substituting your own interpretation of why he was saying it.

You can’t read Cain’s 2008 endorsement and not believe he actually meant it (well, I guess you could believe he was lying in it, but I don’t). Cain also continued to say similar things about ROmney this year, until Cain started shooting up in the polls. Now he mostly ignores Romney.


1,607 posted on 11/06/2011 12:35:50 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1541 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

I in no way said or believe that Cain did not believe his endorsement.

I said his endorsement was tepid and mainly because it was between Romney and McCain.

That in no way implies that I believe Cain didn’t believe, however reluctantly or for whatever pragmatic reasons, that at that time Romney was the better candidate, given the choices.


1,752 posted on 11/06/2011 2:44:27 PM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1607 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson