Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

OK. I have now watched Cain’s Social Security answers in the replay, and I still have a question.

It seemed in his discussion of voluntary privatization that he kept talking about taking the payroll taxes that the company and the individual pays, and allowing individuals to direct parts of those dollars to a private account. That’s fine.

But Cain’s 9-9-9 plan eliminates those payroll taxes. So how would Cain create a partial privatized social security using employer/employee payroll taxes, when there are no payroll taxes? Would he have to fund it from general revenue, since under 9-9-9 social security has to move into general revenue, as it’s dedicated funding stream is eliminated?

Gingrich called for separating Social Security back out of the budget, so it wouldn’t get caught up in the debt debate and so congress wouldn’t keep spending the SS “trust fund”. Obviously you can’t move SS off the budget under Cain’s 9-9-9 plan, because SS becomes a general program.

At least, that’s how I understood 9-9-9. But Cain’s talk on Social Security sounded like there would still be payroll taxes. So I’m confused.

Could one of you kind Cain supporters, who understand the details of 9-9-9, tell me what if anything I got wrong there?


1,235 posted on 11/05/2011 8:37:29 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Instead of paying payroll taxes, those funds could be used for a personal retirement account.


1,552 posted on 11/05/2011 11:11:13 PM PDT by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson