[Mr. Silverback]

There was no foul language in my post. That's the second time you've said that and it isn't true, and you know it. What does that make you?

But I'll repost it and we'll see what you do.

Why is this relevant. You don't have any combat time. Why is this important to you?

It has nothing to do with my combat time or lack thereof. It's relevant because you're talking about how a guy with B-17 combat time is a traitorous wimp who doesn't even get to be called a veteran. It's relevant because you're dishonoring the service of millions who never saw real combat and you're making veterans look bad. Let's see what your record is like, shall we?

When and where did you serve combat time?

[NewinTexsas]

It's relevant because you're talking about how a guy with B-17 combat time is a traitorous wimp who doesn't even get to be called a veteran.

I never said he was a traitorous wimp and I never said he doesn't even get to be called a veteran.

It's relevant because you're dishonoring the service of millions who never saw real combat and you're making veterans look bad.

For the life of me, I don't understand how you can say that my saying that AR was a draftee war correspondent dishonors veterans that never saw combat so I do not find my previous military service to be relevant to this conversation.