And citation is your responsibility. What is the source you are citing?
I did. (Answer my question about Murrow and Pyle)
No, you didn't. I asked two questions in that post; you responded to one. Murrow got in an RAF plane just to get a good story (he wasn't fighting the Germans) and Pyle went to the front just to get a good story (he wasn't there to fight Axis troops) so why is it a problem that Rooney, a correspondent, flew a mission "just to get a good story?" Or is it that Murrow and Pyle are traitorous wimps who don't meet your lofty standards?
No misrepresentation. I stated that he never said he had any motivation to fight. That also means he had no motivation to fight Hitler.
Yet you keep nattering on about how socialists changed their minds about fighting Hitler when he attacked the Soviet Union. How is it relevant if he didn't have that motivation?
Oh. That foul-mouth personal attack on me. I chose to ignore those types of posts. Thank you.
There was no foul language in that post, and what I described you as is what you are. If you're not, prove it by answering my question.
Why is this relevant. You don't have any combat time. Why is this important to you?
It has nothing to do with my combat time or lack thereof. It's relevant because you're a loudmouth talking about how a guy with B-17 combat time is a traitorous wimp who doesn't even get to be called a veteran. It's relevant because you're dishonoring the service of millions and making veterans look bad. Let's see what your record is like, shall we?
Let's hear it, Mr. Truth: When and where did you serve combat time?
As I said before, I ignore foul-mouth personal attacks. When you can act civilized I will respond to you.