Well, other than NONE of what you posted being true, that’s sure interesting.
Wilson was a witness, but he has said he never told anybody. And the guy he worked for confirmed that Wilson never told him anything about it. Wilson just talked about it this week because it has become public, and he wanted to point out that a lot of people knew about it.
The fact that Wilson knew about it doesn’t mean he spoke about it. Cain new about it — does that mean He’s the leaker?
And there is no evidence Anderson got anything from Wilson. Anderson said he first heard about it when he read the piece, so how could he have “worked on it”?
But that’s a nice try to bring the cain supporter fiction into some sort of alignment with the Cain campaign fiction.
Because they spent all day blaming Wilson, and then Cain and Block came out and attacked Cain’s good friend and admirer Anderson. Because after all, Cain is “almost certain” he told Anderson. So of COURSE Anderson HAD to be the one who leaked it — after all, the only two people in the world who knew where Cain and Anderson (well, and Cain’s wife, but she wouldn’t have told anybody).
I hope I don’t need a sarcasm tag for that last bit. And I wish I could tell which freepers know they are making things up, and which are actually clueless enough to believe what they are saying.
Well, Wilson’s credibility as a witness is being challenged by one of the other people at the dinner:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2802161/posts
I wondered the other day why Wilson mentioned “at least three other people” being there but not naming a single one of them. Now we know why — they would not corroborate his story because it was a lie.
I am beginning to think Cain is enjoying this DRAMA, too much.