See post #154 to read about Cain’s back-tracking on his accusation of Mr. Anderson.
I responded to post #154. Go see my response.
Back to what you said, you called Cain's accusation "baseless". I then responded with the circumstatial evidence that Cain gave.
Cain's accusation was NOT baseless.
I still say it was a “baseless” accusation - it was pure speculation on Cain’s part - that is just not good enough proof when you are accusing someone of something that could cause them to lose their job - or lose an election. That is slander if you can’t back it up with FACTS.
That’s irresponsible, stupid or just plain old dishonest.