Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wuli

” .....and there may instead have been a host of reasons why those who made the decisions decided it would be less costly and get the whole matter settled sooner, to make a settlement payment.” <<<<<

Oh, I agree. Like maybe witnesses? And two settlements in three years with a third complaint who did not inhouse sue for settlement? There’s pretty much your “host of reasons”. LOL.


112 posted on 11/03/2011 2:52:52 PM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick, who needs to pound the fiction flackers back into the Stone Age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

“Oh, I agree. Like maybe witnesses? And two settlements in three years with a third complaint who did not inhouse sue for settlement? There’s pretty much your “host of reasons”. LOL.”

As often as not, with sexual harassment cases in the business world, “a settlement” is the purpose of the accusation to begin with. Chances are 50-50 that the accusers got what they sought to get in the first place - $$$$.


121 posted on 11/03/2011 3:16:27 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson