I agree with you on the Cain account as he related it to Greta. Compliments are just that. We all know, however, that it is highly unlikley that it was but “compliments” that would run off two female staffers and cost the company 80 grand for two settlements. I believe that the witnesses probably came forward, which backed up the two complaints. Herb was gone too after only 3 short years.
Not to say that this is not a feeding frenzy going on from the despised media, but really? There are skeletons here that Cain said were not going to be found in his closet. He told us all was baseless. Two settlements are not with out basis. IMHO. :)
Where do you get this info?
So far, everything has boiled down to one woman and one payout of either $35,000 or $45,000, which was a one year severence pay. Everything else has been redacted.
I’m trying to be as civil as possible with you about these accusations you keep throwing out there as though the reader should assume you have a source for them. But civility only goes so far when not reciprocated. I see you’ve now posted the same things on another thread as though they’re facts, including the unsubstantiated claim that Wilson says he told Cain “to cool it, it was embarrassing.” I suggest you find a source that backs that up, as well as your claim that the NRA paid out two separate settlements for a total of $80K +/-, if you plan to keep posting these same things on FR as though they’re facts.
Now you say “you believe” that witnesses came forward that backed up the complaints. You have no basis for that “belief”, which means it’s a fabricated smear. Why do that?
Please do not speak as to what “we all know”, because I’m starting to see that you may be embellishing and outright fabricating a few things in an attempted smear attack. I haven’t seen enough of your posts to know why you might do that, but it’s becoming predictable.