To: Boomer One
I’d be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for bedding a subordinate, but cheating on his wife? Not so much...
71 posted on
11/03/2011 10:29:45 AM PDT by
Wayne07
To: MrShoop
Sexual harassment, in this case, is about power, not the sex. She's young, far junior to Cain, and possibly slightly inebriated. She willingly consents to the sex, in that he didn't force himself upon her, but did she feel that she had to consent, or she might suffer consequences in her job, career.
If, IF..he took a young female staffer back to his apartment, that's incrfedibly stupid judgement..
82 posted on
11/03/2011 10:33:31 AM PDT by
ken5050
(Cain/Gingrich 2012!!! because sharing a couch with Pelosi is NOT the same as sharing a bed with her)
To: MrShoop
Here’s the problem: the article never says he had sex with her. It’s worded in a way to make you draw that conclusion, but they are weasel words.
93 posted on
11/03/2011 10:35:37 AM PDT by
Warren_Piece
(Smart is easy. Good is hard.)
To: MrShoop
but cheating on his wife? Not so much... At the moment, I am inclined to say if there was one transgression twenty years ago and he and is wife worked it out, then it is no one else's business.
Given the field of candidates, I am willing to overlook one mistake in Cain's personal life.
At the moment. But I am worried.
250 posted on
11/03/2011 11:17:02 AM PDT by
teenyelliott
(welcome to the Twilight Zone)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson