Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan

Oh yes there is implied guilt....too many story changes..as I said Cains not helping his situation...not handling this crisis well at all....it’s not so much this did or not happen..it’s how is he handling this...not well.


312 posted on 11/03/2011 11:38:37 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: caww
Sorry. I completely disagree.

There is no implied guilt with the settlement. And there is no implied guilt at the unfolding recollection of incidents that occurred decades ago and were handled by others. It's SOP to 'settle' in these kinds of cases.

As for how he's 'handling' it.....you should have heard Rush dress that argument down today. Now Bill Clinton and John Edwards....THEY handled their situations well (Rush's sarcasm).

Cain is not a seasoned politician. Cain is not slick. And Cain is being fired upon by an unethical media.

I'm not troubled by his 'handling' of this awful situation.

And I'm certainly not finding him guilty with absolutely not one SHRED of evidence.

333 posted on 11/03/2011 11:46:27 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson