Who do you believe, a supreme court nominee or some ditzy story about public hairs on a Coke can?
Particularly when the ditz followed the gentleman on two job promotions and was promised fame and fortune for her testimony by libtards who couldn't stand to see another promotion for a man who has behaved in nothing less than gentlemanly fashion for more than two decades since?
Given the texture of the hair on then-Mr Thomas' head, I have always wondered how Ms Hill could distinguish well enough to assert that what she saw was a "public hair."